Prime Minister Boris Johnson waves on the doorstep of number 10 after making a statement in Downing Street following the Conservative Party's return to power in the General Election with an increased majority.
Victoria Jones/PA Images via Getty ImagesEarlier today, WME and more than 50 of its clients sent a public letter to U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, encouraging the government to urgently tackle the live touring crisis brought about by the Brexit trade deal with the European Union.
In order for artists, their crew and equipment to move between the U.K. and EU, additional permissions are now required, including work visas, carnets (goods passport) and permits. The additional cost, administrative burden and delays associated with obtaining these permissions are "the latest threat to an industry already ravaged by the devastating impact of the pandemic" and will prove "particularly onerous for new and emerging talent for whom live touring in the U.K./EU may no longer be a reality," a statement from WME reads.
In the letter below, agents and music artists ask that the government act without any further delay and engage with its EU counterparts to ensure visa-free touring for artists.
RT Hon Boris Johnson MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London, SW1A 2AA
Dear Prime Minister:
The UK music industry, which sustains over 197,000 full-time jobs, is amongst the most affected by COVID-19’s devastating impacts, and thousands of musicians whose livelihoods depend on touring are keen to get back to work. However, due to the changes brought about by Brexit, we are facing a crisis that may prevent that from happening, and we need your help.
Over the past several decades, the UK has experienced a consistent upward trajectory in live touring, bringing with it a significant and positive economic impact. Much of this success was due to our ability to tour the EU with much greater ease. According to research by the Incorporated Society of Musicians (ISM), 44% of UK musicians were earning up to half of their earnings in the EU, and nearly a third spent more than 30 days in the EU for work per year.
Due to new immigration rules, UK musicians and our teams will not be able to tour Europe without obtaining certain visas and work permissions (in addition to those permissions required to transport equipment cross-border and the changes to the rules around cabotage), far in advance. In some territories, the process to obtain these work visas can take months, causing a logistical nightmare as many engagements are booked on much tighter timeframes, and which is made more cumbersome if an artist is required to surrender their passport throughout each visa application process. Additionally, should the booking need to be rescheduled the process starts all over again. These new challenges will impact all musicians, and unfortunately, emerging talent in particular, as touring becomes cost prohibitive for most.
We welcome your recent promise in Parliament to fix this crisis facing our industry. It is encouraging to hear that the Government is working ‘flat out’ with EU Member States to iron out the huge challenges we now face, but as the live events industry begins to reopen around the UK and Europe, a successful resolution must be found quickly.
To deliver on your commitment, we urge you to find solutions that ensure performers and their creative teams do not need to obtain a visa and work permit each time they seek paid work in any EU country. We, in collaboration with our industry partners and in support of the campaign #LetTheMusicMove, seek and implore you to deliver on your commitment, and urge you to find solutions that ensure performers and their creative teams can seek paid work in any EU country without impediment.
With planning already underway for tours this year, there is a limited window of opportunity to solve the issues threatening our industry. Reducing the complexities of new border regulations and the prohibitive costs to UK musicians touring in the EU will open the door to an exciting and vibrant future for UK talent.
We would ask that you urgently consider our request to fervently engage on this issue to ensure that additional paperwork and costs are removed to enable musicians to tour Europe once more and bring joy to millions of people.
Thank you for your consideration.
Alison Goldfrapp & Will Gregory (Goldfrapp)
Anna Calvi
Barns Courtney
Big Society
Blane Muise
Bow Anderson
Culture Club
Danny L Harle
DON BROCO
Duran Duran
Dylan Cartlidge
Emeli Sandé
Fatboy Slim
George Riley
Georgia Twinn
Gramn.
Grand Pax
Greentea Peng
Groove Armada
HONNE
Hot Chip
Hot Since 82
IDER
Idris Elba
Jarvis Cocker
Jessie Ware
Johnny Flynn
Kaiser Chiefs
Keane
KEYAH/BLU
Kindness
Knucks
LCYTN
Leftfield
Leon Vynehall
Lily Moore
Louis Dunford
Mabel
Madness
Massive Attack
Mumford & Sons
Mysie
Nilüfer Yanya
Pete Tong
Rick Astley
Sad Night Dynamite
Scarlxrd
The Hunna
Totally Enormous Extinct Dinosaurs
Tourist
TVAM
William Doyle
YONAKA
Young Fathers
NEWS
No matter what you thought of the Kendrick Lamar and Drake battle, there was only one undisputed winner by the end of it all: the reaction community in the worlds of streaming and YouTube. Your favorite content creators broke down the bars, reacted to all the most shocking moments, and helped this showdown become one of hip-hop's most culturally significant and resonant moments in a long time... For better or worse. See, the battle's technically not over yet, but only because the 6ix God's idea of victory is clearly quite different. In his federal defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group – his label – for releasing K.Dot's "Not Like Us," he named various content creators who allegedly helped boost the track's widespread popularity and, as a result, its supposedly defamatory nature.
Furthermore, the specific allegation that Drake brings up in this highly controversial lawsuit is that UMG "whitelisted" copyright claims for YouTubers, streamers, etc. concerning "Not Like Us." This means that they would be able to monetize their content without facing a copyright claim from UMG over "Not Like Us," and this isn't really an allegation because various creators have backed this up. But a few important (alleged) caveats that people are talking about online need to be clear. First, "whitelisting" supposedly happens on behalf of a record label behind a song like the West Coast banger, and UMG is instead the distributor of that track. Secondly, as rapper and online personality ScruFaceJean brings up as seen in the post below, tracks like "Push Ups" were also "whitelisted" by its team.
Along with Jean, many other of your favorite content creators spoke out against this Drake lawsuit. Zias! and B.Lou, for example, spoke with their lawyer about the possibility of countersuing for emotional distress, as they found the Toronto superstar's accusations and his implication of them very disturbing and misguided. NoLifeShaq also dragged The Boy through the mud, calling him "soft" and positing that, whether "whitelisting" happened or not, they would react to "Not Like Us" accordingly as they did to his own tracks.
In addition, it's important to bring up that many others fans have pointed to how Drake excitedly used streamers to generate hype and reaction clips for his own diss tracks against Kendrick Lamar. The most direct example is with Kai Cenat, whom he texted to "stay on stream" before dropping "Family Matters." Ironically, the Twitch giant appears in this clowned-upon defamation lawsuit as an example of what the OVO mogul's accusations and implications are. And one more thing: there is no direct link between monetization and algorithmic boosting on sites like YouTube. With all this in mind, content creators seem to feel almost insulted at the idea that they only reacted to the two biggest rappers in the world beefing with each other because one of them would allow them to make money. If Drizzy knew the first thing about the reaction community, maybe he wouldn't have included this...
